How EuroExec is built.

Quality comes from separating who writes a task from who judges it, across seven steps.

44Expert authors
47Expert judges
598Double-judged tasks
6Frontier models, blind
2Independent expert grades per task
  1. Expert authoring

    44 vetted domain experts (CV screen plus a one-on-one interview; median 7 years of experience; based in 10 European countries) each write a hard, self-contained executive scenario and a 5 to 10 point grading checklist, drawn from problems they have worked first-hand. Copy-paste is disabled in the authoring tool, so every prompt is typed by the expert who wrote it.

  2. Automated QA

    An LLM screens each task on six criteria. Blocking: hint leakage, checklist relevance, prohibited patterns. Warning: professional language, a clear role, concrete specificity. Anything that fails goes back to the author with structured notes.

  3. Difficulty gate

    Claude Haiku 4.5 attempts each prompt over 5 passes, and Gemini Flash, from a different model family, measures how much of the checklist it covers. A task passes only when first-pass coverage stays at or below 60%. Anything easier goes back to the author for a rewrite (about 30 rewrites per item in the first release). Because tasks were filtered against Claude Haiku 4.5, its score here is biased downward. We report it anyway.

  4. Lead review

    With the automated gates passed, a domain lead reviews the prompt and its checklist for realism, clarity, and a fair grading key, then approves the task to proceed. Authoring is deliberately kept separate from judging.

  5. Blind generation

    Six frontier models each answer the prompt. Responses are stripped of model identity and shuffled into blind slots, so evaluators never know which lab produced which answer.

  6. Dual expert evaluation

    Two independent, domain-matched experts each grade every response: five rubrics scored 1 to 5 (Domain Accuracy, Strategic Reasoning, Actionability & Specificity, Executive Communication, Local / Regulatory Fidelity), checklist hit / partial / miss, a forced ranking of all answers, and a written rationale. Every task is judged twice, independently.

  7. Adjudication & gold

    A senior data reviewer calibrates scoring, adjudicates disagreements between the two experts, and signs off the final, versioned gold set that ships.

See what the 598 tasks are made of.

Help us build a better platform for experts

We use analytics to see which tasks and features work for you, and marketing cookies to measure the campaigns that bring new experts in. Nothing optional is set until you choose. Change your mind anytime in Cookie settings.

Cookie policy

Cookie settings

Pick what you are comfortable with. You can change this anytime from Cookie settings.

Strictly necessary

Login, security and storing this choice. Required for the app to work.

Always on

Product analytics Helps us most

Helps us see which parts of the platform work well and where things get stuck, so we can make it smoother for you.

Marketing

Lets us see which campaigns bring new experts to Sovrano AI, so we can keep growing the community and the projects on offer.

See the full list of cookies